Editorial 
What
really
happened on 9-11?
Whatever you believe, the end result can be viewed here.
According to a poll conducted by CNN, over 82% of Americans believe that the official
story
of 9-11
is false
and that the government is part of a cover up. There is the 'official' version
and then there are unofficial versions of this story
[see: Edna
Cintron], but all you need is a few looking from a different perspective,
and the 'official' version should be quickly disregarded out of common sense.
Many alternative efforts
have utilized the scientific method, the laws
of physics and other engineering principles to gather evidence. Subsequently,
some have published articles with verifiable data. An excellent example of this
is one theory proposed by a Finnish military expert
or the work done by Dr. Judy
Wood. There seem to be four main 9-11 theories, and two groups with very different
opinions as to the facts. One group consists of the mainstream media/press and
the 9-11 commission, the other
group is made up of
researchers, academics, and engineers. The latter group in general, and certain
specialties in particular examined issues such as physical evidence, the paper
trail, and the money trail [See: WTC
missing gold]. The existence of a money trail
creates the need for a fifth category. The fifth theory unifies the war in Iraq
with the cabal that planned 9-11. The four theories are as follows: 
Is the official story.
The US got caught with its pants down and terrorists did 9-11. The wars in the
Middle East are part of the greater war on terrorism.
Is the incompetence excuse. There was information available about the coming attacks,
but due to the US 's level of disorganization and a stellar level of incompetence
they failed to see it. Terrorists attacked the US and the wars in the Middle East
were based on mistakes (more incompetence), but now we have to stay in this for
a long time.
Is they let
it happen (they meaning the Bush Administration). The US knew full well about
the coming 9-11 attack but allowed it to happen in order to use it as a pretext
to go to war with Iraq, Afghanistan and eventually Iran because it was in the
military-industrial complex and other corporate interests business plans (particularly
oil)
to do so.
Is they made it happen (they meaning the Bush Administration). The Bush government
either helped protect the terrorists or simply used them as patsies, and assisted
the plane crashes with effective demolition charges in the form of bombs placed
inside the towers prior to 9-11. The wars in the Middle East were about oil fields
and oil/gas pipelines,
geopolitical interests and Uranium. The 9-11 was an inside job camps say the evidence
must land you somewhere between three and four. As you do more research and gain
more knowledge number four becomes more and more appealing. Now throw in a 5th
scenario. [See: more
spying ] This whole plan is called 'Shekinah
or 'shock and awe'.
Is the Neo-cons made it happen with the assistance of a foreign government (Israel
– MOSSAD).
[See: Almost
all of the important pipeline is buried] The same government (Israel) where
PNAC's
papers were first written. The same government who sends its citizens to the US
to spy for it. They have been stealing secrets from the US for three decades,
and more recently gathering intelligence about Iran. Last but not least the same
psychos who made up the shadow government of the OSP.
The OSP cherry picked and fabricated the lies told about Iraq in order to start
that war. The Wars in the Middle East were for separate reasons. Afghanistan
was about a few pipelines
as noted but more so about controlling the large quantities
of untapped Uranium
(the main reason for the ten year Russian invasion (failed mission) in the early
1980's and more recently, the US led invasion (failed mission) and occupation
five years ago. Second reason for invading Afghanistan was to financially benefit
by controlling the Opium
trade. The CIA
uses this drug money to fund it's off the book black operations. Continue»
^Top
Editorial
1
Columbine